Introduction

Choosing between N8n vs Integromat comes down to how much flexibility, control, and scale you need from an automation platform.

N8n positions itself as an open-source workflow automation tool with over 200 integrations, custom nodes, visual building, and self-hosting options. Integromat, now branded as Make, presents itself as a visual AI automation platform with over 3,000 pre-built apps, AI agents, and a free plan that includes 1,000 credits per month. On entry pricing, N8n starts at $20 per month for 2.5k workflow executions, while Integromat starts at $12 per month for 10k credits.

For buyers comparing an Integromat alternative, the real decision is less about whether both can automate workflows and more about which operating model fits your team: open and customizable with infrastructure choice, or broad app coverage with credit-based plans and a visual-first interface.

Product Overview

N8n

N8n is an open-source workflow automation platform designed to connect apps and services for efficient task management. It combines a visual workflow editor with the ability to go deeper with code, and it supports custom nodes for unique requirements.

The platform highlights AI agents and workflows, traceable reasoning on the canvas, deployment on your infrastructure or N8n's cloud, and more than 10k workflow templates. N8n also emphasizes its use among technical teams, with use cases spanning IT operations, security operations, lead automation, CRM workflows, RAG, backend prototyping, and embedded deployments.

Integromat

Integromat, now Make, describes itself as a visual AI automation platform. It focuses on connecting apps, data sources, and AI models to build and manage automations and AI agents visually, in code, or with a prompt.

Make highlights over 3,000 pre-built apps, transparent AI agents, a library of agents, enterprise automation, and business-focused solutions across marketing, sales, operations, customer experience, finance, IT, HR, and workplace productivity.

N8n vs Integromat: Feature Comparison

Core Features Comparison

N8n and Integromat both cover visual automation, integrations, templates, and AI-oriented workflows, but they target somewhat different buyer priorities.

N8n's strongest differentiator is control. It combines visual workflow design with code-level depth, supports custom nodes, and can be deployed either on your own infrastructure or via N8n's managed offering. That makes it especially relevant for technical teams that need more ownership over automation logic, runtime environment, and customization.

Integromat's strongest differentiator is breadth of app connectivity and packaged visual automation. Its library of over 3,000 pre-built apps is substantially larger, and it packages AI agents, agent libraries, and prompt-based building into a visual-first experience.

For teams comparing N8n vs Integromat on flexibility, N8n is the better fit when open architecture and deployment choice matter more than the largest possible app catalog.

N8n vs Integromat Pricing

N8n's pricing is execution-based, starting at $20 per month for 2.5k executions with unlimited steps. Integromat uses credits, starting at $12 per month for 10k credits, with each module action counting as one credit.

At the mid-tier, N8n Pro costs $50 per month and includes 10k workflow executions, 20 concurrent executions, workflow history, and execution search. Integromat Pro costs $21 per month for 10k credits and adds priority execution, custom variables, and full-text execution log search.

If your workflows are step-heavy, N8n's unlimited-step execution model can be an important pricing distinction. If your use case is spread across many smaller module actions and you want lower entry pricing, Integromat has the cheaper starting paid tier.

Usage & User Experience

N8n vs Integromat for building workflows

N8n emphasizes building visually while still allowing deeper coding when needed. Its workflow editor supports triggers, actions, and data transformation without requiring programming knowledge, while still giving technical teams room to extend the platform through custom nodes.

Integromat emphasizes a visual-first interface and also frames workflow creation as possible visually, in code, or with a prompt. That combination makes it appealing to users who want broad app connectivity and AI-assisted workflow creation inside a highly visual environment.

N8n vs Integromat for technical teams

N8n speaks more directly to technical teams. Its product messaging focuses on traceable agent reasoning on the canvas, infrastructure choice, custom nodes, embedded deployments, backend prototyping, and operational use cases such as IT ops and sec ops.

Integromat is broad in business coverage, with dedicated solution paths for marketing, sales, operations, finance, IT, HR, and productivity. Buyers looking for a cross-functional automation platform with a large app ecosystem may find that breadth especially attractive.

Best Use Cases

Choose N8n if you need:

• Open-source workflow automation
• Self-hosting or deployment on your own infrastructure
• Custom nodes for specialized integrations or internal systems
• Technical team workflows involving AI agents, RAG, IT ops, or sec ops
• Execution-based pricing with unlimited steps per execution

Choose Integromat if you need:

• A very large catalog of pre-built app integrations
• A free plan with 1,000 credits per month
• Prompt-based and visual AI automation building
• Team features such as team roles and shared scenario templates
• Broad business use cases across marketing, sales, finance, HR, and productivity

Is N8n a Good Integromat Alternative?

Yes, N8n is a strong Integromat alternative for buyers who value flexibility over packaged breadth.

The biggest reason is its open-source model and deployment choice. N8n lets teams build visually, extend with code, create custom nodes, and run the platform on their own infrastructure or in N8n's cloud. That makes it particularly compelling for organizations with internal tooling needs, compliance requirements, or more technical automation teams.

Integromat remains attractive for buyers who prioritize pre-built app coverage and lower-cost entry plans. But if your automation strategy depends on control, extensibility, and infrastructure ownership, N8n stands out clearly.

Who Should Choose Which

Choose N8n when:

• Your team wants an open-source platform
• You need self-hosting or tighter deployment control
• You expect to customize workflows beyond standard app connectors
• You want strong support for technical and operational automation use cases

Choose Integromat when:

• Your priority is access to over 3,000 pre-built apps
• You want a free plan with no time limit
• You prefer a visual-first platform with prompt-based automation building
• Your team wants packaged collaboration features at the Teams tier

Conclusion

For most buyers, the N8n vs Integromat decision comes down to control versus breadth. Integromat offers a larger pre-built app library and lower entry pricing, while N8n offers open-source flexibility, custom nodes, infrastructure choice, and a workflow model built for teams that want to go deeper.

If you want an Integromat alternative that gives your team more ownership over how automations are built and deployed, N8n is the stronger long-term fit. You can explore it directly at N8n.

FAQ

What is the main difference between N8n and Integromat?

The biggest difference is platform model. N8n is an open-source workflow automation platform with self-hosting and custom-node support, while Integromat is a visual AI automation platform centered on broad app connectivity and credit-based plans.

Which platform has more integrations, N8n or Integromat?

Integromat advertises over 3,000 pre-built apps. N8n highlights over 200 app integrations in its structured product details and over 500 integrations in its product messaging, while also supporting custom API connections and custom nodes.

Is N8n cheaper than Integromat?

Integromat has the lower starting paid price at $12 per month for 10k credits, compared with N8n Starter at $20 per month for 2.5k workflow executions. The better value depends on your automation pattern, especially whether you are more sensitive to credits per action or executions with unlimited steps.

Does N8n support self-hosting?

Yes. N8n explicitly offers deployment on your infrastructure or on its own managed environment. That is one of its clearest differentiators for teams that need more control over runtime and deployment.

Which is better for technical teams?

N8n is better aligned with technical teams. Its positioning includes custom nodes, deeper coding flexibility, infrastructure choice, AI agents, RAG, IT operations, security operations, and backend prototyping.

Is N8n a good alternative to Integromat for AI workflows?

Yes. N8n supports AI agents and AI workflow automation, with visual building and traceable reasoning on the canvas. Integromat also has strong AI positioning, but N8n is especially compelling when AI workflows need more customization or deployment control.